<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Hypocrisy Weblog &#187; Internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hypocrisy.nu/tag/internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hypocrisy.nu</link>
	<description>A blog about modern media, PR, society, technology and how they all bind together.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 13:51:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Swedish home electronics chain &#8220;TeknikMagasinet&#8221; sells trojan infected USB memory sticks</title>
		<link>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2008/05/13/swedish-home-electronics-chain-teknikmagasinet-sells-trojan-infected-usb-memory-sticks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2008/05/13/swedish-home-electronics-chain-teknikmagasinet-sells-trojan-infected-usb-memory-sticks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 13:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henrik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Backlash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In the news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ouch!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[annoyances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trojan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usb memory stick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[idg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[idg.se]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swedish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teknikmagasinet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viruses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypocrisy.nu/?p=116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the Swedish IDG news-service, Swedish home electronic chain &#8220;TeknikMagasinet&#8221; is selling USB memory sticks (ZAP Slider USB 8G) that are/were infected with a trojan.
An angry reader of IDG&#8217;s daily IT-newspaper &#8220;Computer Sweden&#8221; contacted them and shared his story. The reader had bought 3 usb memory sticks and all of them were in unbroken [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the Swedish <a title="idg idg.se teknikmagasinet home electronics chain store trojan zap slider usb news internet " href="http://www.idg.se/2.1085/1.161150">IDG news-service</a>, Swedish home electronic chain &#8220;<a title="teknikmagasinet electronics chain store cool stuff consumer goods" href="http://www.teknikmagasinet.se">TeknikMagasinet</a>&#8221; is selling <a title="usb memory stick slider 8 gb gigabyte trojan infected virus" href="http://www.teknikmagasinet.se/nydb/db.pl?template_file=db_product.html&amp;artnr=181033#">USB memory sticks</a> (ZAP Slider USB 8G) that are/were infected with a trojan.</p>
<p>An angry reader of IDG&#8217;s daily IT-newspaper &#8220;<a title="idg idg.se news computer sweden daily it" href="http://computersweden.idg.se">Computer Sweden</a>&#8221; contacted them and shared his story. The reader had bought 3 usb memory sticks and all of them were in unbroken casings. All 3 usb memory sticks had 60 Megabyte used and when plugged into a Microsoft Windows Vista computer, the anti virus application reacted and warned against a trojan being present on the memory stick. Also Microsoft Windows XP were used as a test-subject and the anti virus application reacted on this platform as well.</p>
<p>The reader claimed to have contacted TeknikMagasinet, asking for an explanation, however there was no alleged return-contact by anyone over at the home electronics chain.</p>
<p>Christian Ekstrand at TeknikMagasinet says that only a small number in a particular batch of usb memory sticks that TeknikMagasinet manufacture themselves in Taiwan were infected and that &#8220;only 50 usb memory sticks were infected&#8221; (as far as he knows). Mr Ekstrand says that he can however not speak about how many , if any, of the customers of TeknikMagasinet that bought the particular products were affected by the incident. He also says that this is the first incident over the last 4-5 years that TeknikMagasinet has co-operated with the particular plant in Taiwan. Also, he said that the reason to why the Computer Sweden reader didn&#8217;t hear from TeknikMagasinet was that they weren&#8217;t able to reach him and that they in no way or form is trying to tone down the incident.</p>
<p>Mr Ekstrand continues to say that &#8220;the virus is pretty harmless and for example only tries to steal World of Warcraft login information&#8221; and that &#8220;the customer should not be at risk if they have an anti virus program installed&#8221; (translating / paraphrasing).</p>
<p>A personal reflection here is that I don&#8217;t know if I agree that calling a keylogger that tries to steal information and installs itself automatically as <em>something minor</em>. Who knows what other information the keylogger can harvest if deployed in a customer&#8217;s computer. Would it still be a &#8220;minor issue&#8221; if the customer ends up losing financial information such as his/her credit card number?</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE</strong>: Christian Ekstrand comments in the article&#8217;s <a title="idg comments article christian ekstrand" href="http://www.idg.se/2.1085/1.161150?articleRenderMode=listpostings">comment section</a> that the virus came in through a control computer that was used by an employee of the plant to surf privately. Private surfing is prohibited at the plant, Christian says. Check <a title="symantec virus trojan information" href="http://www.symantec.com/security_response/writeup.jsp?docid=2007-082706-1742-99">this link</a> for information about the trojan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2008/05/13/swedish-home-electronics-chain-teknikmagasinet-sells-trojan-infected-usb-memory-sticks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Critical Wordpress vulnerability, UPDATE NOW!</title>
		<link>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2008/04/26/critical-wordpress-vulnerability-update-now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2008/04/26/critical-wordpress-vulnerability-update-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 23:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henrik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypocrisy.nu/?p=111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is possible for a malicious site visitor to register a special username and gain administrative privileges on your Wordpress Blog. (Described below)
It is recommended to update now!
Wordpress 2.5 Cookie Integrity Protection Vulnerability
Original release date: 2008-04-25
Last revised: 2008-04-25
Latest version: http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/sjm217/advisories/wordpress-cookie-integrity.txt
CVE ID: CVE-2008-1930
Source: Steven J. Murdoch &#60;http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/sjm217/&#62;
Systems Affected:
Wordpress 2.5
Overview:
An attacker, who is able to register a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is possible for a malicious site visitor to register a special username and gain administrative privileges on your Wordpress Blog. (Described below)</p>
<p>It is recommended to <a title="wordpress vulnerability hack support hacking security wordpress.org update download" href="http://wordpress.org/download/">update</a> now!</p>
<blockquote><p>Wordpress 2.5 Cookie Integrity Protection Vulnerability</p>
<p>Original release date: 2008-04-25<br />
Last revised: 2008-04-25<br />
Latest version: <a href="http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/sjm217/advisories/wordpress-cookie-integrity.txt" target="_blank">http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/sjm217/advisories/wordpress-cookie-integrity.txt</a><br />
CVE ID: CVE-2008-1930<br />
Source: Steven J. Murdoch &lt;<a href="http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/sjm217/" target="_blank">http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/sjm217/</a>&gt;</p>
<p>Systems Affected:</p>
<p>Wordpress 2.5</p>
<p>Overview:</p>
<p>An attacker, who is able to register a specially crafted username on<br />
a Wordpress 2.5 installation, is able to generate authentication<br />
cookies for other chosen accounts.</p>
<p>This vulnerability exists because it is possible to modify<br />
authentication cookies without invalidating the cryptographic<br />
integrity protection.</p>
<p>If a Wordpress blog is configured to freely permit account creation,<br />
a remote attacker can gain Wordpress-administrator access and then<br />
elevate this to arbitrary code execution as the web server user.</p>
<p>The vulnerability is fixed in Wordpress 2.5.1</p>
<p>I. Description</p>
<p>Since version 2.5, Wordpress authenticates logged-in users through a<br />
cryptographically protected cookie, based on papers by Fu et al [1]<br />
and Liu et al [2]. This measure was introduced partly in response to<br />
vulnerability CVE-2007-6013 [3,4].</p>
<p>The new cookies are of the form:</p>
<p>&#8220;wordpress_&#8221;.COOKIEHASH = USERNAME . &#8220;|&#8221; . EXPIRY_TIME . &#8220;|&#8221; . MAC</p>
<p>Where:</p>
<p>COOKIEHASH:  MD5 hash of the site URL (to maintain cookie uniqueness)<br />
USERNAME:    The username for the authenticated user<br />
EXPIRY_TIME: When cookie should expire, in seconds since start of epoch<br />
MAC:         HMAC-MD5(USERNAME . EXPIRY_TIME) under a key derived<br />
from a secret and USERNAME . EXPIRY_TIME.</p>
<p>The flaw in this scheme is that USERNAME and EXPIRY_TIME are not<br />
delimited in the MAC calculation. Hence the cookie may be modified,<br />
without altering MAC, provided that the concatenation of USERNAME and<br />
EXPIRY_TIME remains unchanged.</p>
<p>This class of vulnerability, the cryptographic splicing attack, was<br />
commented on by Fu et al [1], but Wordpress does not employ their<br />
recommended defence.</p>
<p>An attacker wishing to exploit this vulnerability would therefore<br />
create an unprivileged account with its username starting with<br />
&#8220;admin&#8221;. The cookie returned on logging into this account can then be<br />
manipulated so as to be valid for the administrator account.</p>
<p>II. Impact</p>
<p>A remote attacker, who can create an account with specially crafted<br />
username, is able to gain administrator level access to the Wordpress<br />
installation. Through standard techniques, this can be escalated to<br />
arbitrary PHP code execution as the web server system user.</p>
<p>III. Solution</p>
<p>Upgrade to Wordpress 2.5.1</p>
<p>Workarounds:</p>
<p>- De-select &#8220;Anyone can register&#8221; in the Membership section of<br />
General Settings to disable account creation.</p>
<p>References:</p>
<p>[1] Dos and Don&#8217;ts of Client Authentication on the Web,<br />
Kevin Fu, Emil Sit, Kendra Smith, Nick Feamster<br />
<a href="http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/papers/webauth:tr.pdf" target="_blank">http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/papers/webauth:tr.pdf</a><br />
[2] A Secure Cookie Protocol,<br />
Alex X. Liu, Jason M. Kovacs, Chin-Tser Huang, Mohamed G. Gouda<br />
<a href="http://www.cse.msu.edu/%7Ealexliu/publications/Cookie/cookie.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.cse.msu.edu/~alexliu/publications/Cookie/cookie.pdf</a><br />
[3] Wordpress Cookie Authentication Vulnerability: CVE-2007-6013<br />
Steven J. Murdoch,<br />
<a href="http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/sjm217/advisories/wordpress-cookie-auth.txt" target="_blank">http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/sjm217/advisories/wordpress-cookie-auth.txt</a><br />
[4] <a href="http://trac.wordpress.org/ticket/5367" target="_blank">http://trac.wordpress.org/ticket/5367</a></p>
<p>Timeline:</p>
<p>2008-04-22: <a href="mailto:security@wordpress.com">security@wordpress.com</a> notified<br />
Confirmation of receipt received<br />
2008-04-25: Wordpress 2.5.1 released incorporating patch<br />
Vulnerability notice published</p></blockquote>
<p>Reference: [<a title="full disclosure email list mailing reference hacking wordpress security hack support" href="http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2008-April/061806.html">Link</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2008/04/26/critical-wordpress-vulnerability-update-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wordpress 2.5 = flawless update (but remember to disable your plugins kids)</title>
		<link>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2008/04/03/wordpress-25-flawless-update-but-remember-to-disable-your-plugins-kids/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2008/04/03/wordpress-25-flawless-update-but-remember-to-disable-your-plugins-kids/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 22:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henrik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[control panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interworx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypocrisy.nu/?p=109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before updating from Wordpress 2.3.3 to Wordpress 2.5 I did a backup within my control panel (Interworx), and after that I followed the instructions per the update page on Wordpress.org.
What did dawn on me was that I didn&#8217;t disable my plugins before I went a head and updated the software, however this sweat was only [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before updating from Wordpress 2.3.3 to Wordpress 2.5 I did a backup within my control panel (Interworx), and after that I followed the instructions per the update page on Wordpress.org.</p>
<p>What did dawn on me was that I didn&#8217;t disable my plugins before I went a head and updated the software, however this sweat was only momentarily as it the process went without any issues even so.</p>
<p>In any case, don&#8217;t hesitate to take the plunge &#8211; it is one great piece of kit this Wordpress. Except for the improved internal cache-handling, the backend is a real treat; fast and easy to use. The auto-update of your installed plugins is another nifty feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2008/04/03/wordpress-25-flawless-update-but-remember-to-disable-your-plugins-kids/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hypocrisy.nu used as a return-domain by spammers</title>
		<link>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2007/11/10/hypocrisynu-used-as-a-return-domain-by-spammers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2007/11/10/hypocrisynu-used-as-a-return-domain-by-spammers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 13:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henrik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[annoyances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hypocrisy.nu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2007/11/10/hypocrisynu-used-as-a-return-domain-by-spammers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello, this is a short note to let you know that Hypocrisy.nu is being used as a return-domain by spammers. Hypocrisy.nu does not condone this type of actions and every email going out from Hypocrisy.nu should have a SPF-pass note added to it.
Thank you for your understanding.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, this is a short note to let you know that Hypocrisy.nu is being used as a return-domain by spammers. Hypocrisy.nu does not condone this type of actions and every email going out from Hypocrisy.nu should have a SPF-pass note added to it.</p>
<p>Thank you for your understanding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2007/11/10/hypocrisynu-used-as-a-return-domain-by-spammers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who is your social filter?</title>
		<link>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2007/09/19/who-is-your-social-filter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2007/09/19/who-is-your-social-filter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 22:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henrik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inspiration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perspective]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikipedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[word-of-mouth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2007/09/19/who-is-your-social-filter/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a lot of talk about &#8220;social media&#8221; and &#8220;social networks&#8221; these days, but what I think really makes a difference for many of us is the social filtering made by one or more (sometimes online) friends.
I have a few good friends that are active within a wide range of areas, where-as one person is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a lot of talk about &#8220;social media&#8221; and &#8220;social networks&#8221; these days, but what I think really makes a difference for many of us is the social filtering made by one or more (sometimes online) friends.</p>
<p>I have a few good friends that are active within a wide range of areas, where-as one person is a bleeding edge kind of software guy (open source / Ubuntu Linux) and whom both try out and give me tips on cool new software for my Ubuntu box (yes, I run both Windows and Ubuntu). Instead of me having to put down time and effort (and sometimes risk) in trying new software, my Linux friend does that job for me.</p>
<p>Another friend is an avid web 2.0 fan, whom jump on basically every site out there. Through him I get reviews of what is good or not, and combining this intelligence with a more general buzz I can decipher what is hot or not.</p>
<p>A third friend is an experienced journalist, and he gives me fresh ideas and angles &#8211; especially when it comes to politics, but also other fields.</p>
<p>The fourth friend is a security expert, who shares his deep knowledge from within the security community.</p>
<p>The fifth friend&#8230; Well, you get the point &#8211; right?! The friendship chain of trust is a very good and (most often) trust-worthy source of information. This is why it is so important to form social bonds with the right people, this is not something that Google, Facebook or Wikipedia can offer you.</p>
<p>In short; never understimate the value of personal relationships.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2007/09/19/who-is-your-social-filter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Webware 100 winners announced &#8211; is this list relevant?</title>
		<link>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2007/06/23/webware-100-winners-announced-is-this-list-relevant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2007/06/23/webware-100-winners-announced-is-this-list-relevant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 08:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henrik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inspiration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Instant Messengers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Yahoo!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netvibes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo! Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eBay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mashup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2007/06/23/webware-100-winners-announced-is-this-list-relevant/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cnet's webware blog has released their top 100-list over the 100 most popular sites on the Internet in the following categories; Browsing, Communications, Community, Data, Entertainment, Media, Mobile, Productivity and Commerce, Publishing, Reference. Here is what could be better.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cnet&#8217;s web 2.0 blog, &#8220;Webware&#8221; has announced it&#8217;s <a href="http://www.webware.com/html/ww/100.html?tag=nl.e776" title="cnet webware top 100 sites and services">Webware 100 winners-list</a>. The question is now; how is this list relevant to anyone in the Internet-business? Each and every category, 10 of them, has 10 winners  each &#8211; and each and every site on the top 100-list anyone who&#8217;s involved in working with the Internet (in any way) have heard of.</p>
<p>The categories are; Browsing, Communications, Community, Data, Entertainment, Media, Mobile, Productivity and Commerce, Publishing, Reference.</p>
<p>Surely, it is a good ego boost for the people behind the services to get recognition, but does it serve any journalistic purpose? I am not so sure about that; Rafe Needleman and the Webware crew are preaching for the already saved. There is no internal ranking of the sites in the individual categories &#8211; so how do I as a visitor know which site got more votes than the other? (Yes, alright &#8211; they do have a <a href="http://www.webware.com/8301-1_109-9728770-2.html">list</a> of the over-all top 10 and the sites that got over 1000 votes, though it doesn&#8217;t show the internal ranking in between the sites within each category. Perhaps the over-all statistic material wasn&#8217;t enough?! I don&#8217;t know&#8230;)</p>
<p>From my own perspective I am glad that the swizz army-knife-like site <a href="http://www.netvibes.com">Netvibes</a>, which deserves more media coverage &#8211; as it is a really nice service to keep track on all your communication needs ranging from rss-feeds (sites, forums, email, blogs etc), to email, to skype, to.. yeah &#8211; you get the idea.</p>
<p>Google was the company with most services in the top 100-list, yet this is not surprising as they are the biggest site on the Internet.</p>
<p>To the Webware authors; Please make the list more detailed the next time and get a broader statistic foundation (aka get more people to vote on the list), then we&#8217;re talking about a relevant list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2007/06/23/webware-100-winners-announced-is-this-list-relevant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RIIA website moved from Windows to Linux</title>
		<link>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2007/06/18/riia-website-moved-from-windows-to-linux/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2007/06/18/riia-website-moved-from-windows-to-linux/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 03:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henrik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Service Providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slashdot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ddos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downtime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2007/06/18/riia-website-moved-from-windows-to-linux/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Via slashdot: xseedit writes &#8220;The RIAA has moved their main Web site www.riaa.com from IIS on Win2003 to Apache 2.2.3 on Red Hat. It appears that the move did not go smoothly as it resulted in an 8-hour downtime starting yesterday around noon, according to Netcraft. And the RIAA is still showing a &#8216;temporarily under [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><strong>Via <a href="http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/06/17/1910247&amp;from=rss" title="RIIA website moved from Windows Server 2003 (IIS) to Red Hat Enterprise Linux (Apache 2.2.3)">slashdot</a></strong>: xseedit writes <em>&#8220;The RIAA has moved their main Web site <a href="http://www.riaa.com/">www.riaa.com</a> from IIS on Win2003 to Apache 2.2.3 on Red Hat. It appears that the move did not go smoothly as it resulted in an 8-hour downtime starting yesterday around noon, according to <a href="http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph?site=www.riaa.com&amp;probe=1" title="Netcraft uptime for RIIA's website">Netcraft</a>. And the RIAA is still showing a &#8216;temporarily under construction&#8217; page. They also moved their DNS from the small company that had been hosting them for the past 4 years, Tomorrow&#8217;s Solutions Today (TST Inc.), to Mindshift Technologies. One can only guess what happened here, but the move seems to have been sudden and unplanned. They still haven&#8217;t moved the riaa.org, riaa.net, and musicunited.org domains â€” those are still pointing to the TST nameservers that no longer accept queries for those domains. TST Inc. deserves credit, however. They seem to have managed to host the RIAA quite successfully for the past 4 years. Will Mindshift do a better job hosting one of the most reviled, and therefore most attacked, Web sites in the world? I wonder if anybody at the RIAA or TST would care to comment on the reasons behind this sudden move. Could it be that the RIAA is being sued by its hosting provider? Or perhaps the sue-happy organizaiton is suing its provider?&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>
As seen above, RIAA&#8217;s website has moved both server environment as well as ISP (Internet service provider). Comments on slashdot express the irony they see of RIAA moving from the closed-source environment being Microsoft Windows Server 2003 to the GPL:ed ditto of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.RIAA is probably one of the prime targets for various attacks (code, ddos, dos) on the Internet, and the move to a more resilient environment such as Red Hat Enterprise Linux was probably a necessity in the end. Also, one can figure that they grew out of the resources that their old ISP, Tomorrow&#8217;s Solutions Today, could provide.</p>
<p>What do you think was the reason for switching both server-environment as well as ISP?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2007/06/18/riia-website-moved-from-windows-to-linux/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Safari web-browser released and hacked within 24 hours</title>
		<link>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2007/06/12/the-safari-web-browser-released-and-hacked-within-24-hours/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2007/06/12/the-safari-web-browser-released-and-hacked-within-24-hours/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henrik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2007/06/12/the-safari-web-browser-released-and-hacked-within-24-hours/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the Mac-hack contest announced by CanSecWest in April, Apple has been a popular target to find security flaws in. I should think that the more a brand sell, the more popular it is to hack&#8230;
However, the Safari-hack must&#8217;ve broken some kind of record as 3 minutes after the public beta of Apple&#8217;s Safari-browser for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the Mac-hack contest announced by CanSecWest in April, Apple has been a popular target to find security flaws in. I should think that the more a brand sell, the more popular it is to hack&#8230;</p>
<p>However, the Safari-hack must&#8217;ve broken some kind of record as 3 minutes after the public beta of Apple&#8217;s Safari-browser for Microsoft Windows was released, self-proclaimed security-expert Aviv Raff found a serious bug in Safari which will make the browser crash and much possibly open up the browser for exploits.</p>
<p>Raff was clearly unhappy with Apple&#8217;s claim that Safari was designed to be &#8220;secure from day one&#8221; (he called this claim &#8220;pathetic&#8221;) but he said he wasn&#8217;t particularly going after Apple. &#8220;I don&#8217;t pick just on Apple,&#8221; he said. &#8220;I&#8217;ve posted about Microsoft and Mozilla issues too.&#8221;</p>
<p>It is not clear if this flaw exists on the Mac OS-version of Safari.</p>
<p>In other words; Do not think that you&#8217;ll be secure just because you opt-in for Apple OS X (or Ubuntu, or&#8230; yes, you get it). Apple, in this case, has been having security-issues with their products. An example of that is their multimedia player Quicktime, where serious vulnerabilities went for weeks without being patched.</p>
<p>Via <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,132796-pg,1/article.html" title="Aviv Raff talks to PC World">PC World</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2007/06/12/the-safari-web-browser-released-and-hacked-within-24-hours/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Playstation 3 &amp; The Ladies of eBay</title>
		<link>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2006/11/21/playstation-3-the-ladies-of-ebay/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2006/11/21/playstation-3-the-ladies-of-ebay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henrik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nintendo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eBay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playstation 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videogames]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weird auctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2006/11/21/playstation-3-the-ladies-of-ebay/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[videoembed('http://www.youtube.com/v/Slih-fiDKmY');
DVRDude @ Digg wrote the following: &#8220;I noticed women of ebay posing provocatively â€” presumably to boost sales. How did this come about? In an effort to limit fraudulent listings, ebay is requiring PS3 and Wii sellers to photographs of receipts, user names, and consolesâ€¦ So a few entrepreneurs must have recalled their Advertising 101 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><script type="text/javascript">videoembed('http://www.youtube.com/v/Slih-fiDKmY');</script></p>
<p><a href="http://digg.com/users/DVRDude">DVRDude</a> @ <a href="http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2006-11/console-wars-the-ladies-of-ebay/">Digg</a> wrote the following: &#8220;I noticed women of ebay posing provocatively â€” presumably to boost sales. How did this come about? In an effort to limit fraudulent listings, ebay is requiring PS3 and Wii sellers to photographs of receipts, user names, and consolesâ€¦ So a few entrepreneurs must have recalled their Advertising 101 â€™sex sellsâ€™ lesson. I took tons of screen grabs!&#8221;</p>
<p>A valid observation, yes indeed &#8211; what &#8220;DVRDude&#8221; didn&#8217;t observe was to be prepared to handle the visitor numbers a digg would bring. Great video-clip, thanks for that &#8211; but a &#8220;less great&#8221; idea to embed the video-clip you uploaded to YouTube on a webserver that couldn&#8217;t handle the load <img src='http://www.hypocrisy.nu/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Fact remains: These eBay auctions really show how the times have changed. (Conclusion: I don&#8217;t remember when half-naked girls were used for selling second hand items) It doesn&#8217;t take much time / marketing-resources to figure out what sells and what does not. In my personal curiosity I wonder if the eBay-auctions with half-naked ladies got higher end-bids than the ones without these bells n&#8217; whistles (that&#8217;s a double pun btw;)).</p>
<p>As the song goes: &#8220;Mad World&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2006/11/21/playstation-3-the-ladies-of-ebay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IP-address tracing for the masses &#8211; Geotargeting+Google Maps=True</title>
		<link>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2006/11/21/ip-address-tracing-for-the-masses-geotargetinggoogle-mapstrue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2006/11/21/ip-address-tracing-for-the-masses-geotargetinggoogle-mapstrue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 22:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henrik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Service Providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ajax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ip-address geographical trace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mashup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2006/11/21/ip-address-tracing-for-the-masses-geotargetinggoogle-mapstrue/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new mashup-service has opened up on http://www.ip-adress.com , which combines the geographical IP-address database (stores the geographical information for the IP-address your computer uses right now on the Internet) from MaxMind and Google Maps.
The site is worth a try, if not for the novelty of it! If you have never used a trace-tool, this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new mashup-service has opened up on http://www.ip-adress.com , which combines the geographical IP-address database (stores the geographical information for the IP-address your computer uses right now on the Internet) from MaxMind and Google Maps.</p>
<p>The site is worth a try, if not for the novelty of it! If you have never used a trace-tool, this is an easy start to discover the &#8220;hidden&#8221; world of the Internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2006/11/21/ip-address-tracing-for-the-masses-geotargetinggoogle-mapstrue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
