<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Hypocrisy Weblog &#187; Safari</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hypocrisy.nu/category/internet/browsers/safari/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hypocrisy.nu</link>
	<description>A blog about modern media, PR, society, technology and how they all bind together.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 13:51:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Webware 100 winners announced &#8211; is this list relevant?</title>
		<link>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2007/06/23/webware-100-winners-announced-is-this-list-relevant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2007/06/23/webware-100-winners-announced-is-this-list-relevant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 08:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henrik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inspiration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Instant Messengers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Yahoo!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netvibes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo! Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eBay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mashup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2007/06/23/webware-100-winners-announced-is-this-list-relevant/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cnet's webware blog has released their top 100-list over the 100 most popular sites on the Internet in the following categories; Browsing, Communications, Community, Data, Entertainment, Media, Mobile, Productivity and Commerce, Publishing, Reference. Here is what could be better.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cnet&#8217;s web 2.0 blog, &#8220;Webware&#8221; has announced it&#8217;s <a href="http://www.webware.com/html/ww/100.html?tag=nl.e776" title="cnet webware top 100 sites and services">Webware 100 winners-list</a>. The question is now; how is this list relevant to anyone in the Internet-business? Each and every category, 10 of them, has 10 winners  each &#8211; and each and every site on the top 100-list anyone who&#8217;s involved in working with the Internet (in any way) have heard of.</p>
<p>The categories are; Browsing, Communications, Community, Data, Entertainment, Media, Mobile, Productivity and Commerce, Publishing, Reference.</p>
<p>Surely, it is a good ego boost for the people behind the services to get recognition, but does it serve any journalistic purpose? I am not so sure about that; Rafe Needleman and the Webware crew are preaching for the already saved. There is no internal ranking of the sites in the individual categories &#8211; so how do I as a visitor know which site got more votes than the other? (Yes, alright &#8211; they do have a <a href="http://www.webware.com/8301-1_109-9728770-2.html">list</a> of the over-all top 10 and the sites that got over 1000 votes, though it doesn&#8217;t show the internal ranking in between the sites within each category. Perhaps the over-all statistic material wasn&#8217;t enough?! I don&#8217;t know&#8230;)</p>
<p>From my own perspective I am glad that the swizz army-knife-like site <a href="http://www.netvibes.com">Netvibes</a>, which deserves more media coverage &#8211; as it is a really nice service to keep track on all your communication needs ranging from rss-feeds (sites, forums, email, blogs etc), to email, to skype, to.. yeah &#8211; you get the idea.</p>
<p>Google was the company with most services in the top 100-list, yet this is not surprising as they are the biggest site on the Internet.</p>
<p>To the Webware authors; Please make the list more detailed the next time and get a broader statistic foundation (aka get more people to vote on the list), then we&#8217;re talking about a relevant list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2007/06/23/webware-100-winners-announced-is-this-list-relevant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Safari web-browser released and hacked within 24 hours</title>
		<link>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2007/06/12/the-safari-web-browser-released-and-hacked-within-24-hours/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2007/06/12/the-safari-web-browser-released-and-hacked-within-24-hours/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henrik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2007/06/12/the-safari-web-browser-released-and-hacked-within-24-hours/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the Mac-hack contest announced by CanSecWest in April, Apple has been a popular target to find security flaws in. I should think that the more a brand sell, the more popular it is to hack&#8230;
However, the Safari-hack must&#8217;ve broken some kind of record as 3 minutes after the public beta of Apple&#8217;s Safari-browser for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the Mac-hack contest announced by CanSecWest in April, Apple has been a popular target to find security flaws in. I should think that the more a brand sell, the more popular it is to hack&#8230;</p>
<p>However, the Safari-hack must&#8217;ve broken some kind of record as 3 minutes after the public beta of Apple&#8217;s Safari-browser for Microsoft Windows was released, self-proclaimed security-expert Aviv Raff found a serious bug in Safari which will make the browser crash and much possibly open up the browser for exploits.</p>
<p>Raff was clearly unhappy with Apple&#8217;s claim that Safari was designed to be &#8220;secure from day one&#8221; (he called this claim &#8220;pathetic&#8221;) but he said he wasn&#8217;t particularly going after Apple. &#8220;I don&#8217;t pick just on Apple,&#8221; he said. &#8220;I&#8217;ve posted about Microsoft and Mozilla issues too.&#8221;</p>
<p>It is not clear if this flaw exists on the Mac OS-version of Safari.</p>
<p>In other words; Do not think that you&#8217;ll be secure just because you opt-in for Apple OS X (or Ubuntu, or&#8230; yes, you get it). Apple, in this case, has been having security-issues with their products. An example of that is their multimedia player Quicktime, where serious vulnerabilities went for weeks without being patched.</p>
<p>Via <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,132796-pg,1/article.html" title="Aviv Raff talks to PC World">PC World</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2007/06/12/the-safari-web-browser-released-and-hacked-within-24-hours/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
