The Hypocrisy Weblog » USA http://www.hypocrisy.nu A blog about modern media, PR, society, technology and how they all bind together. Tue, 13 May 2008 13:51:20 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 en hourly 1 “Only in America” http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2007/11/04/only-in-america/ http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2007/11/04/only-in-america/#comments Sun, 04 Nov 2007 14:02:36 +0000 Henrik http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2007/11/04/only-in-america/ Say, would you like a gunrack with that bed?

The perfect xmas gift! Notice the disclaimer in the end ;-) [link]

]]> http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2007/11/04/only-in-america/feed/ 0 A voice in the debate why Nuclear Bunker Busters should not be used http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2006/05/04/a-voice-in-the-debate-why-nuclear-bunker-busters-should-not-be-used/ http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2006/05/04/a-voice-in-the-debate-why-nuclear-bunker-busters-should-not-be-used/#comments Thu, 04 May 2006 13:12:40 +0000 Henrik http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2006/05/04/a-voice-in-the-debate-why-nuclear-bunker-busters-should-not-be-used/ See this flash-animation and make up your mind on if the United States should send Nuclear Bunker Busters towards Iran or not.

From the page:

“This animation depicts a proposed weapon with a one megaton yield. The funding for this weapon was cut in 2005 defense appropriations. However, the United States still has a B61-11 nuclear ‘bunker buster’ in its arsenal which has a 400 kiloton yield, which could still cause hundreds of thousands of deaths and spread radiation to other countries.”

]]> http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2006/05/04/a-voice-in-the-debate-why-nuclear-bunker-busters-should-not-be-used/feed/ 6