<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Hypocrisy Weblog &#187; Iran</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hypocrisy.nu/category/in-the-news/middle-east/iran/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hypocrisy.nu</link>
	<description>A blog about modern media, PR, society, technology and how they all bind together.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 13:51:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>A voice in the debate why Nuclear Bunker Busters should not be used</title>
		<link>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2006/05/04/a-voice-in-the-debate-why-nuclear-bunker-busters-should-not-be-used/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2006/05/04/a-voice-in-the-debate-why-nuclear-bunker-busters-should-not-be-used/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 13:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henrik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Flash animation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Help us!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In the news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perspective]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weapons of Mass Destruction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2006/05/04/a-voice-in-the-debate-why-nuclear-bunker-busters-should-not-be-used/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[See this flash-animation and make up your mind on if the United States should send Nuclear Bunker Busters towards Iran or not.
From the page:
&#8220;This animation depicts a proposed weapon with a one megaton yield. The funding for this weapon was cut in 2005 defense appropriations. However, the United States still has a B61-11 nuclear &#8216;bunker [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See <a href="http://www.ucsusa.org/global_security/nuclear_weapons/nuclear-bunker-buster-rnep-animation.html">this</a> flash-animation and make up your mind on if the United States should send Nuclear Bunker Busters towards Iran or not.</p>
<p>From the page:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;This animation depicts a proposed weapon with a one megaton yield. The funding for this weapon was cut in 2005 defense appropriations. However, the United States still has a B61-11 nuclear &#8216;bunker buster&#8217; in its arsenal which has a 400 kiloton yield, which could still cause hundreds of thousands of deaths and spread radiation to other countries.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hypocrisy.nu/2006/05/04/a-voice-in-the-debate-why-nuclear-bunker-busters-should-not-be-used/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
