Comments on: A voice in the debate why Nuclear Bunker Busters should not be used

By: Town Called Dobson » If Rove is gone, who will pull Bush’s strings?

Town Called Dobson » If Rove is gone, who will pull Bush’s strings? — Wed, 26 Jul 2006 15:43:16 +0000

[...] Is it any wonder that we are blinded on this issue? Or is it really a calculated strategy to purposefully blind our intelligence on Iran so we can fudge more facts and attack with complete disregard of reality? [...]

By: > n3wjacks blog » Blog Archive » nuclear bunker buster loophole

> n3wjacks blog » Blog Archive » nuclear bunker buster loophole — Wed, 10 May 2006 18:09:41 +0000

[...] This flash animation gives an overview of what might be happening if these nukes are deployed in Iran (through Hypocrisy weblog). [...]

By: Henrik

Henrik — Thu, 04 May 2006 16:42:11 +0000

Cheaper for whom? Depends on if you make money on the ordeal or not… right?!

This is one of the problems with foreign policy, mainly of the United States.

By: Storm Bear

Storm Bear — Thu, 04 May 2006 16:03:05 +0000

My take has always been it is cheaper to deploy a dimplomat than the 83nd Airborne. Ya know?

By: Henrik

Henrik — Thu, 04 May 2006 15:11:39 +0000

Cheers and thanks for the link!!

What if there would be some kind of realism in both military thinking as well as when it comes to the so call “diplomacy”?!

By: Storm Bear

Storm Bear — Thu, 04 May 2006 15:02:32 +0000

The fallout is a huge problem, but the political fallout woould be even worse as it would make nuclear war permissible. And to be the only country to nuke someone (two countries will be the tally) spells a horrendous step backwards in the history civilization. Thanks for posting this animation. hadn't seen it before. Anyway, my daily political cartoon focused on this issue today and I linked it to your post this morning.