Good job, now let’s be consistent: “EU tells Serbia: no Mladic, no entry”

The European Union has now put it’s foot down and denying Serbia membership if they fail to bring Bosnian Serb military leader Ratklo Mladic to the war crimes tribunal in The Hague. This is something valuable for the quality and internal bond of the European Union, making it a factor of justice in Europe.

However, these strict rules need to be applied to prospect countries such as Turkey – where over a half million kurds are being oppressed on a dialy basis by the Turkish regime.

(From The Guardian)

EU tells Serbia: no Mladic, no entry

Simon Jeffery and agencies
Wednesday May 3, 2006

The European Union today suspended membership talks with Serbia over its failure to deliver the Bosnian Serb military leader Ratklo Mladic to the war crimes tribunal in The Hague.

Mladic is the UN tribunal’s second most wanted war crimes suspect from the Yugoslav wars after Radovan Karadzic, the Bosnian Serb political leader. Both are charged in connection with the massacre of more than 7,000 Muslim men and boys at Srebenica.

Announcing the decision to suspend talks, the EU enlargement commissioner, Olli Rehn, said:”Serbia must show that nobody is above the law and that anybody indicted for serious crimes will face justice.”

The western Balkans are a key area for EU enlargement, with supporters of the process arguing that the 25-member bloc has a choice between promoting stability and living with a volatile collection of states on its borders.

The talks had been intended to conclude a stabilisation and association agreement with Serbia, the first step towards EU membership.

But Mr Rehn’s announcement, made after consulting the chief UN prosecutor, Carla Del Ponte, could further destabilise Serbia’s shaky, centre-left coalition. Vojislav Kostunica, the Serbian prime minister, is dependent for parliamentary support on nationalist hardliners who oppose Mladic’s extradition.

In a statement to the press, Mr Kostunica said Mladic was “hiding all alone” after a crackdown on his support network, and called on him to surrender.

He said his government had done “absolutely everything in its power” to capure Mladic and send him to The Hague.

Ms Del Ponte later accused Serbia of misleading UN prosecutors by telling them Mladic’s capture was imminent.

Because of his precarious position, Mr Kostunica was reported to have been trying to persuade Mladic to give himself up voluntarily.

His government faces a summer with plenty of potential for conflict with nationalists: Montenegro votes on dissolving its three-year union with Serbia on May 21, and the ethnic Albanian majority in Kosovo – officially a Serbian province – is seeking full independence in talks under way in Vienna.

The Serbian deputy prime minister, Miroljub Labus, said yesterday the suspension of membership talks would represent a serious defeat for liberal parties advocating closer cooperation with the EU. He predicted that it would have “serious repercussions” on the political situation in Serbia.

Slovenia is the only former Yugoslav republic that is a member of the EU, but Croatia and Macedonia have both signed stabilisation and association agreements with the bloc, which is due to expand to 27 members next year with the entry of Romania and Bulgaria.

Croatia’s membership talks were delayed over its failure to surrender General Ante Gotovina to the UN tribunal to face charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity.

The impasse was broken in October last year when EU national leaders decided to begin talks with Turkey, too. Gen Gotovina, the third most wanted suspect after Mladic, was arrested on the Spanish island of Tenerife the following December.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,


2 Comments so far

  1. kerrygoulde @ May 18th, 2006

    I agree that it is positive, and that consistency is the key to Europe wielding real influence as a force for good in the world.
    I recently read an interesting poll that support for EU entry among Kurds stands at a staggering 93%. Doesn’t this suggest that the EU has been taking action to be seen as a force for justice and human rights protection? Where does this Kurdish confidence come from?

    It is vital that those of us who are pro-Europe continue to highlight the important role that conditional enlargement plays in European human rights. I hope that more pro-Europeans will make their political voices heard through organisations like Europe United (a pan-European internally democratic political party of which I am a member) in order to bring real pressure to bear on EU institutions for a consistent, progressive enlargement policy.

  2. Henrik @ May 21st, 2006

    And you write this just happening to be affiliated with Europe United?!

    I’m not saying anything about the organization as a whole, but the comment smells “mass comment” and “spam”, sorry mate.

    However, I agree in having a united Europe in order to meet the growing global challenges and competition.

    There is a need of a strong voice, and the individual countries alone can’t really influence anything or anyone.

Leave a reply

Categories